Timo Dillenberger
· 21.10.2024
At 330 x 810 x 510 mm when folded, the Tern takes up slightly more space despite having the same wheel size, but it is a good kilo lighter thanks to its aluminium frame and sporty wheels. With a little practice, we managed to fold and unfold the bike in under 50 seconds. Brompton G Line 8-speed slightly faster, but it has two fewer levers.
On the other hand, there is no need for manual force, as the Tern's clamping levers engage without pressure, and the carrier for the right pedal on the frame is ingenious. The double-strut construction of the frame gives the bike a lot of rigidity, riders up to 105 kilos can take a seat, the standard luggage rack is approved for up to 20 kilos.
You can find out more about folding bikes here:
Tern specifies 1.47 m to 1.95 m as the ideal rider height, which is quite realistic thanks to the forward-adjustable stem and the double telescopic seat post.
It's precisely this forward lean that makes this bike sportier - that and the lighter wheels with road tyres. You accelerate more quickly than on the Brompton, both are similarly lively to steer, but when it comes to hard braking, the British bike has the absolute upper hand. Although the V-brakes on the Tern are reliable and sufficient in themselves, the bite and modulation of the discs is kilometres ahead. For heavy riders or with a load, the great strength of the Tern with its road bike gearing - sportiness and speed - could become a problem here.
On a par: The Tern has a lot to offer for purely urban use and is cheaper when adjusted for equipment. In terms of the ratio of folding size to riding characteristics, the brakes ultimately tip the balance in favour of the Brompton G Line.